On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:23:52PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > Allwinner H6 has a similar watchdog as the A64 which is already > a compatible of the A31. > > This commit sort the lines and add the H6 compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt | 10 ++++++---- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt > index 46055254e8dd..f4810f8ad1c5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt > @@ -3,10 +3,12 @@ Allwinner SoCs Watchdog timer > Required properties: > > - compatible : should be one of > - "allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt" > - "allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt" > - "allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt","allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt" > - "allwinner,suniv-f1c100s-wdt", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt" That sorting was kind of intentional > + - "allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt" > + - "allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt","allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt" > + - "allwinner,sun50i-h6-wdt","allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt", > + "allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt" Is there a reason to keep the A64 compatible? Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
