On 9 April 2014 14:34, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07.04.2014 10:38, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rahul,
>>
>> On 3 April 2014 15:30, Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ static char const *exynos_dt_compat[] __initconst = {
>>> "samsung,exynos4412",
>>> "samsung,exynos5",
>>> "samsung,exynos5250",
>>> + "samsung,exynos5260",
>>
>>
>> I don't think we should be adding this as we do not yet have any soc
>> specific quirk.
>> Compatibility to generic string, "samsung,exynos5" should be sufficient.
>>
>
> Yes. Unless a SoC specific quirk that needs to be handled at such low level
> stage emerges, there is no need to add such compatible string to the kernel.
>
Thanks Sachin, Tomasz,
I will change this.
Regards,
Rahul Sharma.
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
