On 06/05/2019 17:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>> Of course it would have been possible to make it a lot more universal by >>> for example adding a prefix, a bit mask or other word lengths. But that >>> would have added a lot of complexity without any actual application. >>> >> >> I have to disagree here. If this is supposed to be a universal SPI byte driver that >> needs special handling then it is either needs to be created in a universal way or needs to be made >> target specific. >> > > Let him be. The driver is good. > > If some hardware needs more flexibility, we add it. > > No need to have 1000 releases of everything. > > Pavel > Hello Pavel, thanks for the support. It's a pure hobby project so I have the time to add useful features or to improve the description to make it clear what the drivers intention is. So if we find a more useful set of features it's a good idea to discuss it. By the way: Although I haven't written a Linux driver yet it's not my first open source project. So I know that there can be a lot of different opinions and sometimes a lot of revisions. So no big risk of scaring me away. Best regards Christian
