Hi! > > Of course it would have been possible to make it a lot more universal by > > for example adding a prefix, a bit mask or other word lengths. But that > > would have added a lot of complexity without any actual application. > > > > I have to disagree here. If this is supposed to be a universal SPI byte driver that > needs special handling then it is either needs to be created in a universal way or needs to be made > target specific. > Let him be. The driver is good. If some hardware needs more flexibility, we add it. No need to have 1000 releases of everything. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
