On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On 23/4/2019 5:17 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:35:40AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > >> For systems in which the touch IRQ is acting as wakeup source, the interrupt > >> controller might not latch the GPIO IRQ during sleep. In such cases, the > >> interrupt will never occur again after resume, hence the touch screen > >> appears dead. > >> > >> To fix this, call into eeti_ts_read() once to read the hardware status and > >> to arm the IRQ again. > > > > Can you instead make the interrupt level-triggered? > > The hardware I'm working on doesn't support that unfortunately. > > In fact, the whole attn-gpio dance is there because of that, and the > GPIO descriptor maps to the same pin that also causes the IRQ in my case. OK, if the interrupt controller is incapable of dealing with level interrupts then we have to do what you propose. Thanks. -- Dmitry