Hi, Yongqiang:
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 14:19 +0800, yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch add RDMA fifo size error handle
> rdma fifo size will not always bigger than the calculated threshold
> if that case happened, we need set fifo size as the threshold
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> index b0a5cff..ead38ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> @@ -137,11 +137,14 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> {
> unsigned int threshold;
> unsigned int reg;
> + unsigned int rdma_fifo_size;
> struct mtk_disp_rdma *rdma = comp_to_rdma(comp);
>
> rdma_update_bits(comp, DISP_REG_RDMA_SIZE_CON_0, 0xfff, width);
> rdma_update_bits(comp, DISP_REG_RDMA_SIZE_CON_1, 0xfffff, height);
>
> + rdma_fifo_size = RDMA_FIFO_SIZE(rdma);
> +
> /*
> * Enable FIFO underflow since DSI and DPI can't be blocked.
> * Keep the FIFO pseudo size reset default of 8 KiB. Set the
> @@ -149,8 +152,12 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> * account for blanking, and with a pixel depth of 4 bytes:
> */
> threshold = width * height * vrefresh * 4 * 7 / 1000000;
> +
> + if (threshold > rdma_fifo_size)
> + threshold = rdma_fifo_size;
I think this is a work around not a correct solution. Why MT8173 has no
this problem but MT8183 has? Is the formula of threshold different in
MT8173 and MT8183?
Regards,
CK
> +
> reg = RDMA_FIFO_UNDERFLOW_EN |
> - RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE(RDMA_FIFO_SIZE(rdma)) |
> + RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE(rdma_fifo_size) |
> RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(threshold);
> writel(reg, comp->regs + DISP_REG_RDMA_FIFO_CON);
> }
