Understanding why of_phandle_iterator_next() returns an error can
sometimes be hard to decipher based solely on the error message, a
typical error example is that #foo-cells = <X> and the phandle property
used has a smaller number of cells specified, e.g.:
#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
phandle = <&scmi_sensor>
instead of:
phandle <&scmi_sensor 0>;
Instead, make it clear what the expectations are towards debugging
incorrect Device Tree faster:
OF: /thermal-zones/scmi-thermal: #thermal-sensor-cells = 1, found 0 instead
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/base.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 5226e898476e..20e0e7ee4edf 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -1350,8 +1350,9 @@ int of_phandle_iterator_next(struct of_phandle_iterator *it)
* property data length
*/
if (it->cur + count > it->list_end) {
- pr_err("%pOF: arguments longer than property\n",
- it->parent);
+ pr_err("%pOF: %s = %d found %d\n",
+ it->parent, it->cells_name,
+ count, it->cell_count);
goto err;
}
}
--
2.17.1
