On Wed, 03 Apr 2019, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > Hello Lee, > > Thanks for taking a look on this again =) I agree with most of the > comments and correct them at next version. > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:31:52AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > > > ROHM BD70528MWV is an ultra-low quiescent current general > > > purpose single-chip power management IC for battery-powered > > > portable devices. > > > > > > Add MFD core which enables chip access for following subdevices: > > > - regulators/LED drivers > > > - battery-charger > > > - gpios > > > - 32.768kHz clk > > > - RTC > > > - watchdog > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > + * Mapping of main IRQ register bits to sub irq register offsets so > > > > "sub-IRQ" > > > > > + * that we can access corect sub IRQ registers based on bits that > > > > "sub IRQ" is also fine, but please standardise. > > > > I do prefer "sub-IRQ" though. > > I'll go with "sub-IRQ" then > > > > + > > > +#define WD_CTRL_MAGIC1 0x55 > > > +#define WD_CTRL_MAGIC2 0xAA > > > +/** > > > + * bd70528_wdt_set - arm or disarm watchdog timer > > > + * > > > + * @data: device data for the PMIC instance we want to operate on > > > + * @enable: new state of WDT. zero to disable, non zero to enable > > > + * @old_state: previous state of WDT will be filled here > > > + * > > > + * Arm or disarm WDT on BD70528 PMIC. Expected to be called only by > > > + * BD70528 RTC and BD70528 WDT drivers. The rtc_timer_lock must be taken > > > + * by calling bd70528_wdt_lock before calling bd70528_wdt_set. > > > + */ > > > +int bd70528_wdt_set(struct rohm_regmap_dev *data, int enable, int *old_state) > > > > Why doesn't this reside in the watchdog driver? > > If my memory serves me right we shortly discussed this already during v8 > review ;) Cant blame you though as I have seen some of the mail traffic > going through your inbox :D > > The motivation to have the functions exported from MFD is to not create > sirect dependency between RTC and WDT. There may be cases where we want > to leave either RTC or WDT out of compilation. MFD is always needed so > the dependency from MFD to RTC/WDT does not harm. > > (Here's some discussion necromancy if you are interested in re-reading > how we did end up with this implementation: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190212091723.GZ20638@dell/) > > I hope you are still Ok with having the WDT control functions in MFD. OOI, why does the RTC need to control the WDT? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
