> Update iProc I2C binding document to add new compatible string > "brcm,iproc-nic-i2c". Optional property "brcm,ape-hsls-addr-mask" is > also added that allows configuration of the host view into the APE's > address for "brcm,iproc-nic-i2c" I don't know the platform, but wouldn't it be more DT-like to describe the APE in DT and derive the mask from that information? Custom bindings with values which are directly poked into a register usually raise my eyebrow.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
