Each eTSEC MAC has its own TBI (SGMII) PCS and private MDIO bus.
But due to a DTS oversight, both SGMII-compatible MACs of the LS1021 SoC
are pointing towards the same internal PCS. Therefore nobody is
controlling the internal PCS of eTSEC0.
Upon initial ndo_open, the SGMII link is ok by virtue of U-boot
initialization. But upon an ifdown/ifup sequence, the code path from
ndo_open -> init_phy -> gfar_configure_serdes does not get executed for
the PCS of eTSEC0 (and is executed twice for MAC eTSEC1). So the SGMII
link remains down for eTSEC0. On the LS1021A-TWR board, to signal this
failure condition, the PHY driver keeps printing
'803x_aneg_done: SGMII link is not ok'.
Fixes: 055223d4d22d ("ARM: dts: ls1021a: Enable the eTSEC ports on QDS and TWR")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a-twr.dts | 9 ++++++++-
arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a-twr.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a-twr.dts
index 97e1fb7..9b1fe99 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a-twr.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a-twr.dts
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
};
&enet0 {
- tbi-handle = <&tbi1>;
+ tbi-handle = <&tbi0>;
phy-handle = <&sgmii_phy2>;
phy-connection-type = "sgmii";
status = "okay";
@@ -225,6 +225,13 @@
sgmii_phy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
reg = <0x2>;
};
+ tbi0: tbi-phy@1f {
+ reg = <0x1f>;
+ device_type = "tbi-phy";
+ };
+};
+
+&mdio1 {
tbi1: tbi-phy@1f {
reg = <0x1f>;
device_type = "tbi-phy";
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
index b4f2723..3a3d264 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
@@ -709,6 +709,15 @@
<0x0 0x2d10030 0x0 0x4>;
};
+ mdio1: mdio@2d64000 {
+ compatible = "gianfar";
+ device_type = "mdio";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x0 0x2d64000 0x0 0x4000>,
+ <0x0 0x2d50030 0x0 0x4>;
+ };
+
ptp_clock@2d10e00 {
compatible = "fsl,etsec-ptp";
reg = <0x0 0x2d10e00 0x0 0xb0>;
--
2.7.4
