The jz4780_bch_init name was confusing, as it suggested that its content
should be executed once at init time, whereas what the function really
does is reset the hardware for a new ECC operation.
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Notes:
v5: New patch
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c
index fdf483a49f7b..7635753bd7ea 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ struct jz4780_bch {
struct mutex lock;
};
-static void jz4780_bch_init(struct jz4780_bch *bch,
- struct jz4780_bch_params *params, bool encode)
+static void jz4780_bch_reset(struct jz4780_bch *bch,
+ struct jz4780_bch_params *params, bool encode)
{
u32 reg;
@@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ int jz4780_bch_calculate(struct jz4780_bch *bch, struct jz4780_bch_params *param
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&bch->lock);
- jz4780_bch_init(bch, params, true);
+
+ jz4780_bch_reset(bch, params, true);
jz4780_bch_write_data(bch, buf, params->size);
if (jz4780_bch_wait_complete(bch, BCH_BHINT_ENCF, NULL)) {
@@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ int jz4780_bch_correct(struct jz4780_bch *bch, struct jz4780_bch_params *params,
mutex_lock(&bch->lock);
- jz4780_bch_init(bch, params, false);
+ jz4780_bch_reset(bch, params, false);
jz4780_bch_write_data(bch, buf, params->size);
jz4780_bch_write_data(bch, ecc_code, params->bytes);
--
2.11.0
