On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:29:05AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > It's mostly about making sure that any existing dtbs don't have their > numbers shifted around. So hopefully any overlapping identifiers aren't > in use yet and then those ids can be changed while leaving the ones that > are in use how they are. In practice I bet no one uses Linux 5.0's i.MX8M device trees since they lack too much support. It's so basic it's not useful. You'd still run your existing non-mainline bindings until it is. Thus I would argue changing the ABI right now would be the only chance there is. If you think that chance is gone, then I guess the reasonable thing is to keep the numbers and only move those (to the end) which overlap. Or put them into that erreneous number gap. Patrick
