Re: [PATCH/RFC 05/15] dt-bindings: display: bridge: thc63lvd1024: Document dual-link operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



HI Laurent,

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:57:39PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 05:49:25PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:23:35AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The THC63LVD1024 LVDS decoder can operate in two modes, single-link or
> > > dual-link. In dual-link mode both input ports are used to carry even-
> > > and odd-numbered pixels separately. Document this in the DT bindings,
> > > along with the related rules governing port and usage.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/display/bridge/thine,thc63lvd1024.txt         | 7 +++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/thine,thc63lvd1024.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/thine,thc63lvd1024.txt
> > > index 37f0c04d5a28..4ff6eb9bbc19 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/thine,thc63lvd1024.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/thine,thc63lvd1024.txt
> > > @@ -28,6 +28,13 @@ Optional video port nodes:
> > >  - port@1: Second LVDS input port
> > >  - port@3: Second digital CMOS/TTL parallel output
> > >
> > > +The device can operate in single-link mode or dual-link mode. In single-link
> > > +mode, all pixels are received on port@0, and port@1 shall not contain any
> > > +endpoint. In dual-link mode, even-numbered pixels are received on port@0 and
> > > +odd-numbered pixels on port@1, and both port@0 and port@1 shall contain
> > > +endpoints.
> >
> > You know, I'm not sure this is helpful, as if we have to go and
> > describe what the chip supports, a paragraph for dual ouput mode would
> > be required as well. The bindings already document that the chip
> > supports single/dual input/output modes, maybe you can just add rules
> > that prescribes how to populate the endpoints, for both input and
> > output modes?
>
> That's what I was trying to do :-) How else would you like to see it
> described ?
>

I wonder if it won't be enough to expand the Optional endpoint
properties description as in:

 - port@1: Second LVDS input port, to be used for dual-input mode
 - port@3: Second digital CMOS/TTL parallel output, to be used for
   dual-output mode.

If you prefer providing more context, it's fine what you had, just
keep in mind there's also dual-output mode and not just the dual-input
one.

Up to you, feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
if relevant.

Thanks
  j

> > > +
> > > +
> >
> > You can drop this empty line.
> >
> > >  Example:
> > >  --------
> > >
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux