Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: new bus driver for efm32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:17:49AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> I would call it a false positive and ignore it.=A0 You need to justify any
> reports from checkpatch that remain "this is more readable" seems a valid
> justification.

I agree in general. In this case, I think both options have their pros
and cons in terms of readability, so I let the author decide.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux