On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:00 AM Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote: > Mark, Linus, > > So, I hope it is clear from Roger's responses that above assertions do > not hold true to this INTC, and so want to confirm that we are good with > the current non-hierarchical design. IIUC the 64 lines are latched onto 8 lines, but all 64 lines have individual masking and ACKing bits and can all be used at the same time, so yes that is cascading and then you should indeed use the chained (or nested) IRQ handler. Yours, Linus Walleij
