Hi Tomi, On Friday 21 March 2014 15:37:17 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 21/03/14 00:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > The OF graph bindings documentation could just specify the ports node as > > optional and mandate individual device bindings to specify it as mandatory > > or forbidden (possibly with a default behaviour to avoid making all > > device bindings too verbose). > > Isn't it so that if the device has one port, it can always do without > 'ports', but if it has multiple ports, it always has to use 'ports' so > that #address-cells and #size-cells can be defined? You can put the #address-cells and #size-cells property in the device node directly without requiring a ports subnode. > If so, there's nothing left for the individual device bindings to decide. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
