On 21/03/14 14:37, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 21/03/14 00:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> > The OF graph bindings documentation could just specify the ports node as >> > optional and mandate individual device bindings to specify it as mandatory or >> > forbidden (possibly with a default behaviour to avoid making all device >> > bindings too verbose). > > Isn't it so that if the device has one port, it can always do without > 'ports', but if it has multiple ports, it always has to use 'ports' so > that #address-cells and #size-cells can be defined? > > If so, there's nothing left for the individual device bindings to decide. Wouldn't it make the bindings even more verbose ? Letting the individual device bindings to decide sounds more sensible to me. -- Thanks, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
