On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 14:49:27 +0000 <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>> +#define QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ BIT(24) > > > > And this one would be > > > > define QSPI_IFR_SAM9X60_READ_TRSFR BIT(24) > > I prefer letting this bit named as in the datasheet, QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ, > and change it if future versions of the IP will modify its sense. It is a READ > transfer done on APB, it is more generic this way. If you have a strong opinion > on this, please let me know. As you wish.
