On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:22 AM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add support for thermal throttling on SDM845. > > We introduce a generic flag to be used by cpufreq drivers to tell the > cpufreq core to auto-register a thermal cooling device. > > There are a few miscellaneous fixes to keep checkpatch happy. > > If this approach is acceptable I can send a series converting other cpufreq > drivers to use this flag and get rid of driver code. > > Amit Kucheria (9): > [ALREADY QUEUED] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move to device_initcall > drivers: thermal: of-thermal: Print name of device node with error > drivers: cpufreq: Add thermal_cooling_device pointer to struct > cpufreq_policy > cpufreq: Add a flag to auto-register a cooling device > cpufreq: Replace open-coded << with BIT() > cpufreq: qcom-hw: Register as a cpufreq cooling device > arm64: dts: sdm845: Increase alert trip point to 95 degrees > arm64: dts: sdm845: wireup the thermal trip points to cpufreq > thermal: cpu_cooling: Clarify error message > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 ++ > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 5 +- > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 2 +- > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 4 +- > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 34 +++-- > 6 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) Would it be possible to split this series so as to put the cpufreq patches separately?
