On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:20 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:32 AM Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Now that more of the sdm845 bindings are headed upstream this a refresh of > > of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39308/ to add bindings and nodes > > for the GPU/GMU and GPU SMMU for sdm845. v7 of this patchset also removes > > interrupt-names from the driver and the existing DT changes per feedback from > > Rob Herring. > > > > This is based on : > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git for-next > > > > with: > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1018365/ > > > > This change requires the following dependencies: > > > > include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10711119/ > > > > qcom,smmu-v2 binding: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10581911/ > > > > v7: Add patches to remove interrupt-names, add version specific compatible > > string for gmu > > v6: Update GPU bindings for a6xx and make the examples match the nodes and vice > > versa. Clean up types and rebase on > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1018365/ to help facilitate merging. > > v5: Use symbolic names for the RPMH power levels defined in OPP table, > > move the opp tables as children of their respective nodes and rename > > the iommu device. > > v4: Rebase > > v3: Split GMU PDC region into two GPU specific sections, fix indentation, > > really use qcom,gmu for the phandle name > > v2: changed qcom,arc-level to qcom,level following discussion with Viresh; > > change gmu phandle to qcom,gmu per Rob > > > > Jordan Crouse (6): > > drm/msm/gpu: Remove hardcoded interrupt name > > drm/msm: drop interrupt-names > > ARM: dts: qcom: Removed unused interrupt-names from GPU node > > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Remove unused interrupt-names from GPU > > dt-bindings: drm/msm/a6xx: Document GMU and update GPU bindings > > arm64: dts: sdm845: Add gpu and gmu device nodes > > I know it's been holidays and everyone (including me) has been on > vacation, but just wanted to make sure the current status of this > series was explicitly called out. :-) > > > I believe patches #1 and #2 are ready to land and will go through your tree. > > Patches #3 and #4 should probably go through Andy's tree and are not > urgent (they are just cleanup). They can sit on the back burner until > patches #1 and #2 have hit mainline. That's a good reason to land #1 > and #2 sooner. ;-) > > I think patch #5 is also ready to land. There's been some > bikeshedding about the exact format for the opp table, but none of > that bikeshedding affects the bindings that Jordan wrote. If you > agree that this is OK to land, it would also be nice to get in. > > ...then Jordan can spin patch #6 (once Rob H Acks Rajendra's opp > bindings) alone at a future date. > I've picked up 1+2 and 5.. I assume it makes more sense for agross to pick up the rest? BR, -R
