Hi Rob, On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:32 AM Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now that more of the sdm845 bindings are headed upstream this a refresh of > of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39308/ to add bindings and nodes > for the GPU/GMU and GPU SMMU for sdm845. v7 of this patchset also removes > interrupt-names from the driver and the existing DT changes per feedback from > Rob Herring. > > This is based on : > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git for-next > > with: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1018365/ > > This change requires the following dependencies: > > include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10711119/ > > qcom,smmu-v2 binding: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10581911/ > > v7: Add patches to remove interrupt-names, add version specific compatible > string for gmu > v6: Update GPU bindings for a6xx and make the examples match the nodes and vice > versa. Clean up types and rebase on > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1018365/ to help facilitate merging. > v5: Use symbolic names for the RPMH power levels defined in OPP table, > move the opp tables as children of their respective nodes and rename > the iommu device. > v4: Rebase > v3: Split GMU PDC region into two GPU specific sections, fix indentation, > really use qcom,gmu for the phandle name > v2: changed qcom,arc-level to qcom,level following discussion with Viresh; > change gmu phandle to qcom,gmu per Rob > > Jordan Crouse (6): > drm/msm/gpu: Remove hardcoded interrupt name > drm/msm: drop interrupt-names > ARM: dts: qcom: Removed unused interrupt-names from GPU node > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Remove unused interrupt-names from GPU > dt-bindings: drm/msm/a6xx: Document GMU and update GPU bindings > arm64: dts: sdm845: Add gpu and gmu device nodes I know it's been holidays and everyone (including me) has been on vacation, but just wanted to make sure the current status of this series was explicitly called out. :-) I believe patches #1 and #2 are ready to land and will go through your tree. Patches #3 and #4 should probably go through Andy's tree and are not urgent (they are just cleanup). They can sit on the back burner until patches #1 and #2 have hit mainline. That's a good reason to land #1 and #2 sooner. ;-) I think patch #5 is also ready to land. There's been some bikeshedding about the exact format for the opp table, but none of that bikeshedding affects the bindings that Jordan wrote. If you agree that this is OK to land, it would also be nice to get in. ...then Jordan can spin patch #6 (once Rob H Acks Rajendra's opp bindings) alone at a future date. -Doug
