On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 01:14 -0800, Sean Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:09 PM Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2018-12-29 at 06:04 +0800, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 04:09:40PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> > > > From: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The commit adds mt8183 compatible node in binding document.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Erin Lo <erin.lo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..7b5285e
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8183.txt
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> > > > +* Mediatek MT8183 Pin Controller
> > > > +
> > > > +The Mediatek's Pin controller is used to control SoC pins.
> > > > +
> > > > +Required properties:
> > > > +- compatible: value should be one of the following.
> > > > + "mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl", compatible with mt8183 pinctrl.
> > > > +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
> > > > +- #gpio-cells: number of cells in GPIO specifier. Since the generic GPIO
> > > > + binding is used, the amount of cells must be specified as 2. See the below
> > > > + mentioned gpio binding representation for description of particular cells.
> > > > +- gpio-ranges : gpio valid number range.
> > > > +
> > > > + Eg: <&pio 6 0>
> > > > + <[phandle of the gpio controller node]
> > > > + [line number within the gpio controller]
> > > > + [flags]>
> > > > +
> > > > + Values for gpio specifier:
> > > > + - Line number: is a value between 0 to 202.
> > > > + - Flags: bit field of flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
> > > > + Only the following flags are supported:
> > > > + 0 - GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH
> > > > + 1 - GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
> > > > +
> > > > +Optional properties:
> > > > +- reg: physicall address base for gpio base registers.
> > >
> > > s/physicall/physical/
> > >
> > > reg should never be optional.
> > >
> > > Need to say how many reg entries.
> >
> > ==> Thanks for your suggestion. We will change 'reg' to Required
> > properties and add the reg entries in next version.
> > >
> > > > +- reg-names: gpio base registers name.
> > >
> > > Need to say what are the names. However, I don't find the names in the
> > > example all that useful, so I'd just drop it.
> >
> > ==> we will add the reg-names in next version.
> > They are used in the sample code, such as:
> > > + reg-names = "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2",
> > > > + "iocfg3", "iocfg4", "iocfg5",
> > > > + "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8";
> >
> > >
> > > > +- interrupt-controller: Marks the device node as an interrupt controller
> > > > +- #interrupt-cells: Should be two.
> > > > +- interrupts : The interrupt outputs from the controller.
> > > > +
> > > > +Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt in this directory for details of the
> > > > +common pinctrl bindings used by client devices.
> > > > +
> > > > +Subnode format
> > > > +A pinctrl node should contain at least one subnodes representing the
> > > > +pinctrl groups available on the machine. Each subnode will list the
> > > > +pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer
> > > > +configuration, pullups, drive strength, input enable/disable and input schmitt.
> > > > +
> > > > + node {
> > > > + pinmux = <PIN_NUMBER_PINMUX>;
> > > > + GENERIC_PINCONFIG;
> > > > + };
> > > > +
> > > > +Required properties:
> > > > +- pinmux: integer array, represents gpio pin number and mux setting.
> > > > + Supported pin number and mux varies for different SoCs, and are defined
> > > > + as macros in boot/dts/<soc>-pinfunc.h directly.
> > > > +
> > > > +Optional properties:
> > > > +- GENERIC_PINCONFIG: is the generic pinconfig options to use, bias-disable,
> > > > + bias-pull-down, bias-pull-up, input-enable, input-disable, output-low, output-high,
> > > > + input-schmitt-enable, input-schmitt-disable and drive-strength are valid.
> > > > +
> > > > + Some special pins have extra pull up strength, there are R0 and R1 pull-up
> > > > + resistors available, but for user, it's only need to set R1R0 as 00, 01, 10 or 11.
> > > > + So when config mediatek,pull-up-adv or mediatek,pull-down-adv,
> > > > + it support arguments for those special pins.
> > > > +
> > > > + When config drive-strength, it can support some arguments, such as
> > > > + MTK_DRIVE_4mA, MTK_DRIVE_6mA, etc. See dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h.
> > > > +
>
> One point we can fix more is the drive-strength already is supported
> as the generic one, not need to depend on a dedicated header file.
==> We think that we use MTK_DRIVE_4mA to set as driving in dts. it it
more clear in v2 common driver for single pin -> single group mode.
How about the idea?
Thanks.
>
> > > > +Examples:
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "mt8183-pinfunc.h"
> > > > +
> > > > +...
> > > > +{
> > > > + pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
> > > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-pinctrl";
> > > > + reg = <0 0x10005000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11F20000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11E80000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11E70000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11E90000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11D30000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11D20000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11C50000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > + <0 0x11F30000 0 0x1000>;
> > > > + reg-names = "iocfg0", "iocfg1", "iocfg2",
> > > > + "iocfg3", "iocfg4", "iocfg5",
> > > > + "iocfg6", "iocfg7", "iocfg8";
> > > > + gpio-controller;
> > > > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > > > + gpio-ranges = <&pio 0 0 192>;
> > > > + interrupt-controller;
> > > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 153 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > > +
> > > > + i2c0_pins_a: i2c0@0 {
> > >
> > > unit-address without reg property is not valid.
> >
> > ==> we will change "i2c0_pins_a: i2c0@0" to "i2c0_pins_a: i2c0" in the
> > next version.
> > >
> > > > + pins1 {
> > > > + pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO48__FUNC_SCL5>,
> > > > + <PINMUX_GPIO49__FUNC_SDA5>;
> > > > + mediatek,pull-up-adv = <11>;
> > > > + };
> > > > + };
> > > > +
> > > > + i2c1_pins_a: i2c1@0 {
> > > > + pins {
> > > > + pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO50__FUNC_SCL3>,
> > > > + <PINMUX_GPIO51__FUNC_SDA3>;
> > > > + mediatek,pull-down-adv = <10>;
> > > > + };
> > > > + };
> > > > + ...
> > > > + };
> > > > +};
> > > > --
> > > > 1.9.1
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
