Hi Eduardo Valentin,
Thank you for the review. I will address your comments in next patchset.
Please find my comments in lined.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:33 AM Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 08:41:19PM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> > From: Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Stingray SoC has six temperature sensor and those are
> > configured, controlled and accessed to read temperature
> > and update in DDR memory using m0 firmware.
> > All six sensors has been given 4 bytes of memory in DDR
> > to write temperature in millivolts.
> >
> > This thermal driver read temperature values from DDR
> > because no direct access to sensors.
> > Like this all temparature sensors are monitored and
> > trips at critical temperature.
> >
> > If driver can't handle thermal runaways because of
> > any unknown reason, then firmware in m0 Processor
> > will handle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 3 +-
> > drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig | 9 +++
> > drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > index 0e69edc..5f9f070 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > @@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ config MTK_THERMAL
> > controller present in Mediatek SoCs
> >
> > menu "Broadcom thermal drivers"
> > -depends on ARCH_BCM || ARCH_BRCMSTB || ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST
> > +depends on ARCH_BCM || ARCH_BRCMSTB || ARCH_BCM2835 || ARCH_BCM_IPROC || \
> > + COMPILE_TEST
> > source "drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig"
> > endmenu
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
> > index c106a15..dc9a9bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
> > @@ -22,3 +22,12 @@ config BCM_NS_THERMAL
> > BCM4708, BCM4709, BCM5301x, BCM95852X, etc). It contains DMU (Device
> > Management Unit) block with a thermal sensor that allows checking CPU
> > temperature.
> > +
> > +config BCM_SR_THERMAL
> > + tristate "Stingray thermal driver"
> > + depends on ARCH_BCM_IPROC || COMPILE_TEST
> > + default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
> > + help
> > + Support for the Stingray family of SoCs. Its different blocks like
> > + iHost, CRMU and NITRO has thermal sensor that allows checking its
> > + temperature.
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile
> > index fae10ec..79df69e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_THERMAL) += bcm2835_thermal.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BRCMSTB_THERMAL) += brcmstb_thermal.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_NS_THERMAL) += ns-thermal.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_SR_THERMAL) += sr-thermal.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..f45e12e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2018 Broadcom
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * In stingray thermal IO memory,
> > + * Total Number of available TMONs MASK is at offset 0
> > + * temperature registers BASE is at 4 byte offset.
> > + * Each TMON temperature register size is 4.
> > + */
> > +#define SR_TMON_TEMP_BASE(id) ((id) * 0x4)
> > +
> > +#define SR_TMON_MAX_LIST 6
> > +
> > +struct sr_tmon {
> > + struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> > + unsigned int crit_temp;
> > + unsigned int tmon_id;
> > + struct sr_thermal *priv;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct sr_thermal {
> > + void __iomem *regs;
> > + unsigned int max_crit_temp;
> > + struct sr_tmon tmon[SR_TMON_MAX_LIST];
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int sr_get_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> > +{
> > + struct sr_tmon *tmon = data;
> > + struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal = tmon->priv;
> > +
> > + *temp = readl(sr_thermal->regs + SR_TMON_TEMP_BASE(tmon->tmon_id));
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sr_tz_ops = {
> > + .get_temp = sr_get_temp,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int sr_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal;
> > + struct sr_tmon *tmon;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + uint32_t sr_tmon_list = 0;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + sr_thermal = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*sr_thermal), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!sr_thermal)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + sr_thermal->regs = (void __iomem *)devm_memremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> > + resource_size(res),
> > + MEMREMAP_WB);
> > + if (IS_ERR(sr_thermal->regs)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get io address\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(sr_thermal->regs);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "brcm,tmon-mask", &sr_tmon_list);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + tmon = sr_thermal->tmon;
> > + for (i = 0; i < SR_TMON_MAX_LIST; i++, tmon++) {
> > +
> > + if (!(sr_tmon_list & BIT(i)))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* Flush temperature registers */
> > + writel(0, sr_thermal->regs + SR_TMON_TEMP_BASE(i));
> > + tmon->tmon_id = i;
> > + tmon->priv = sr_thermal;
> > + tmon->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(dev, i, tmon,
> > + &sr_tz_ops);
> > + if (IS_ERR(tmon->tz))
> > + return PTR_ERR(tmon->tz);
> > +
> > + dev_info(dev, "thermal sensor %d registered\n", i);
> >
>
> Does this really need to be dev_info() level? Usually just pollutes boot
> message logs..
I will change dev_info to dev_dbg.
>
> + }
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sr_thermal);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sr_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + struct sr_tmon *tmon;
> > +
> > + tmon = sr_thermal->tmon;
> > + for (i = 0; i < SR_TMON_MAX_LIST; i++, tmon++)
> > + if (tmon->tz)
> > + devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev,
> > + tmon->tz);
>
> Why did you need to explicitly call devm_.*unregister()?
Yes, this call is not required I will remove sr_thermal_remove
function completely.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id sr_thermal_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "brcm,sr-thermal", },
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sr_thermal_of_match);
> > +
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id sr_thermal_acpi_ids[] = {
> > + { .id = "BRCM0500" },
> > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sr_thermal_acpi_ids);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver sr_thermal_driver = {
> > + .probe = sr_thermal_probe,
> > + .remove = sr_thermal_remove,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "sr-thermal",
> > + .of_match_table = sr_thermal_of_match,
> > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(sr_thermal_acpi_ids),
> > + },
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(sr_thermal_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Stingray thermal driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
Regards,
Srinath.
