On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:35:07PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current > arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible > along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings future safe. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > --- > > Hi Joerg, > I am picking this out separately from the sdm845 smmu support > series [1], so that this can go through iommu tree. > The dt patch from the series [1] can be taken through arm-soc tree. > > Hi Will, > As asked [2], here's the resend version of dt binding patch for sdm845. > Kindly ack this so that Joerg can pull this in. Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Joerg -- please can you take this on top of the pull request I sent already? Vivek included it as part of a separate series which I thought was going via arm-soc, but actually it needs to go with the other arm-smmu patches in order to avoid conflicts. Cheers, Will > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt > index a6504b37cc21..3133f3ba7567 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt > @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ conditions. > "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2", > "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2". > > + Qcom SoCs implementing "arm,mmu-500" must also include, > + as below, SoC-specific compatibles: > + "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500" > + > - reg : Base address and size of the SMMU. > > - #global-interrupts : The number of global interrupts exposed by the > -- > QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member > of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation >
