On 04/12/2018 09:25, Joseph Lo wrote: > From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Add new properties to configure the DFLL PWM regulator support. Also > add an example and make the I2C clock only required when I2C support is > used. > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt | 73 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt > index dff236f524a7..8c97600d2bad 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt > @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ the fast CPU cluster. It consists of a free-running voltage controlled > oscillator connected to the CPU voltage rail (VDD_CPU), and a closed loop > control module that will automatically adjust the VDD_CPU voltage by > communicating with an off-chip PMIC either via an I2C bus or via PWM signals. > -Currently only the I2C mode is supported by these bindings. > > Required properties: > - compatible : should be "nvidia,tegra124-dfll" > @@ -45,10 +44,28 @@ Required properties for the control loop parameters: > Optional properties for the control loop parameters: > - nvidia,cg-scale: Boolean value, see the field DFLL_PARAMS_CG_SCALE in the TRM. > > +Optional properties for mode selection: > +- nvidia,pwm-to-pmic: Use PWM to control regulator rather then I2C. > + > Required properties for I2C mode: > - nvidia,i2c-fs-rate: I2C transfer rate, if using full speed mode. > > -Example: > +Required properties for PWM mode: > +- nvidia,pwm-period: period of PWM square wave in microseconds. > +- nvidia,init-uv: Regulator voltage in micro volts when PWM control is disabled. Maybe consider 'pwm-inactive-voltage-microvolt'. > +- nvidia,align-offset-uv: Regulator voltage in micro volts when PWM control is > + enabled and PWM output is low. Would this be considered the minimum pwm active voltage? > +- nvidia,align-step-uv: Voltage increase in micro volts corresponding to a > + 1/33th increase in duty cycle. Eg the voltage for 2/33th > + duty cycle would be: Maybe consider 'pwm-voltage-step-microvolt'. > + nvidia,align-offset-uv + nvidia,align-step-uv * 2. > +- pinctrl-0: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is enabled. > +- pinctrl-1: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is disabled. > +- pinctrl-names: must include the following entries: > + - dvfs_pwm_enable: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is enabled. > + - dvfs_pwm_disable: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is disabled. Please see Rob's feedback on the above [0]. Cheers Jon [0] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/885328/ -- nvpublic
