On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:57 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:30 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We discussed merging all ARM reference design mach-* to one dir > > if I just name that mach-arm then we get a convergence to the > > vendor name in some organic way. > > TBC, you want .../boot/dts/arm/* for all the ARM, Ltd boards? Just > making sure as you were arguing against vendor names. :) I am not against vendor names, but I am also for SoC names because I think whatever makes most sense should be the rule, so both/and not either/or. One does not exclude the other. It's just a name. In this case what I meant was that while we (me and Arnd) originally discussed merging it all into mach-versatile (how would you know) if I instead merge it all into mach-arm, we get a 1:1 correspondence between mach-dir and vendor name and DTS dir so everyone is happy. Yours, Linus Walleij
