On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:30 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:05 PM Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06/12/2018 07:58:24-0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:39 AM Uwe Kleine-König > > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:01:59AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > i.MX23 is a Sigmatel chip STMP?? > > > > > > > > I think the Freescale i.MX23 didn't exist at Sigmatel back then. AFAIK > > > > this is a new design using IP from Sigmatel after the aquisition. > > > > > > It is not. I was in the i.MX group which Sigmatel was merged into at > > > the time. Purely marketing rebranding. > > > > > > > Wouldn't it be easier to name the directory to the corresponding mach-* > > entry? > > > > So, imx23 and imx28 would go to mxs/, other imx in imx/. And this also > > solves the Marvell mess with the Synaptics Socs going in berlin/ and the > > other ones in mvebu/. > > I like this idea. Fine by me though I think marvell gets more complicated than that. I'll try a pass at that at least for the cases with a mixture of families. > We discussed merging all ARM reference design mach-* to one dir > if I just name that mach-arm then we get a convergence to the > vendor name in some organic way. TBC, you want .../boot/dts/arm/* for all the ARM, Ltd boards? Just making sure as you were arguing against vendor names. :) Rob
