RE: [RFC PATCH v2 08/15] usb:cdns3: Implements device operations part of the API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi
>>> +
>>> +static struct usb_ep *cdns3_gadget_match_ep(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
>>> +					    struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *desc,
>>> +					    struct usb_ss_ep_comp_descriptor *comp_desc)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct cdns3_device *priv_dev = gadget_to_cdns3_device(gadget);
>>> +	struct cdns3_endpoint *priv_ep;
>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> +	priv_ep = cdns3_find_available_ss_ep(priv_dev, desc);
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(priv_ep)) {
>>> +		dev_err(&priv_dev->dev, "no available ep\n");
>>> +		return NULL;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	dev_dbg(&priv_dev->dev, "match endpoint: %s\n", priv_ep->name);
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv_dev->lock, flags);
>>> +	priv_ep->endpoint.desc = desc;
>>> +	priv_ep->dir  = usb_endpoint_dir_in(desc) ? USB_DIR_IN : USB_DIR_OUT;
>>> +	priv_ep->type = usb_endpoint_type(desc);
>>> +
>>> +	list_add_tail(&priv_ep->ep_match_pending_list,
>>> +		      &priv_dev->ep_match_list);
>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv_dev->lock, flags);
>>> +	return &priv_ep->endpoint;
>>> +}
>>
>>Why do you need a custom match_ep?
>>doesn't usb_ep_autoconfig suffice?
>
>I need to test it but at first glance it  looks like usb_ep_autoconfig suffice.
>
>>
>>You can check if EP is claimed or not by checking the ep->claimed flag.
>>
I checked it and did not work correct. The flag claimed is set in usb_ep_autoconf, but 
a little bit later during USB RESET this flag is cleared. 
So, I can't base on this flag.  I think that it's incorrect behavior in gadget core driver or in function drivers.
Maybe we should have additional flag in usb_ep object used during resetting, or usb_ep_autoconf function should be called after each USB RESET. 

I notice that I can based on ep->address it is set also in usb_ep_autoconf and probably is not cleared anywhere.
It's little tricky, but It looks like it works correct. I add some comment for this checking. 
Maybe in feature I will be able to replace it with claimed flag.

Felipe what's your opinion about claimed flag.  It's should be fixed or not ?

Cheers
Pawel




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux