Harmless mistake, but it's incorrect. The DT spec provides recommendations
for the node names:
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the
name should be one of the following choices:
...
interrupt-controller"
Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- Add commit log details about why
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
index 2322268bc862..4c1ab49c7d39 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
status = "okay";
};
- gic: gic@44101000 {
+ gic: interrupt-controller@44101000 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic", "arm,gic-400";
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <3>;
--
2.17.1
