Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:18 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > + - "renesas,r8a77965-canfd" for R8A77965 (R-Car M3-N) compatible controller.
> >
> > Eeeks, the 'canfd' is a suffix here not a prefix :( Not your issue,
> > of course. But Simon, shall we fix that for all CANFD?
>
> Unfortunately we cannot, due to backwards compatibility.
> Hence we keep following existing compatible value conventions for existing
> bindings, but follow the recommended way for new devices/bindings.
So that's what I wrote _before_ my mornin' coffee...
"renesas,r8a77965-canfd" _is_ using the recommended order.
"renesas,can-r8a77965" is not.
But my main argument is still valid, of course.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
