Hi Rob, On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:24:51PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:04:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > From: Sriharsha Allenki <sallenki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > It adds bindings for Synopsys 28nm femto phy controller that supports > > LS/FS/HS usb connectivity on Qualcomm chipsets. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sriharsha Allenki <sallenki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Anu Ramanathan <anur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../phy/qcom,snps-28nm-usb-hs-phy.txt | 101 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-28nm-usb-hs-phy.txt > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-28nm-usb-hs-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-28nm-usb-hs-phy.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..75e7a09dd558 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-28nm-usb-hs-phy.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ > > +Qualcomm Synopsys 28nm Femto phy controller > > +=========================================== > > + > > +Synopsys 28nm femto phy controller supports LS/FS/HS usb connectivity on > > +Qualcomm chipsets. > > + > > +Required properties: > > + > > +- compatible: > > + Value type: <string> > > + Definition: Should contain "qcom,usb-snps-hsphy". > > SoC specific compatible? Agreed. A SoC prefixed compatible would be more specific and scalable for handling different programming model of the same IP. I will use "qcom,qcs404-usb-hsphy" in v3. > > > + > > +- reg: > > + Value type: <prop-encoded-array> > > + Definition: USB PHY base address and length of the register map. > > + > > +- #phy-cells: > > + Value type: <u32> > > + Definition: Should be 0. > > + > > +- clocks: > > + Value type: <prop-encoded-array> > > + Definition: See clock-bindings.txt section "consumers". List of > > + three clock specifiers for reference, phy core and > > + sleep clocks. > > + > > +- clock-names: > > + Value type: <string> > > + Definition: Names of the clocks in 1-1 correspondence with the "clocks" > > + property. Must contain "ref", "phy" and "sleep". > > + > > +- resets: > > + Value type: <prop-encoded-array> > > + Definition: See reset.txt section "consumers". PHY reset specifiers > > + for phy core and POR resets. > > + > > +- reset-names: > > + Value type: <string> > > + Definition: Names of the resets in 1-1 correspondence with the "resets" > > + property. Must contain "phy" and "por". > > + > > +- vdd-supply: > > + Value type: <phandle> > > + Definition: phandle to the regulator VDD supply node. > > + > > +- vdda1p8-supply: > > + Value type: <phandle> > > + Definition: phandle to the regulator 1.8V supply node. > > + > > +- vdda3p3-supply: > > + Value type: <phandle> > > + Definition: phandle to the regulator 3.3V supply node. > > + > > +- qcom,vdd-voltage-level: > > + Value type: <prop-array> > > + Definition: This is a list of three integer values <no min max> where > > + each value corresponding to voltage corner in uV. > > + > > +Optional properties: > > + > > +- extcon: > > + Value type: <prop-encoded-array> > > + Definition: Should contain the vbus extcon. > > Don't use extcon for new bindings. Use usb-connector binding. Okay, I just did a bit of research and found that 'extcon' is becoming a deprecated DT property recently and we should OF graph bindings to specify the connector. Will do in v3. > > > + > > +- qcom,init-seq: > > + Value type: <u32 array> > > + Definition: Should contain a sequence of <offset value delay> tuples to > > + program 'value' into phy register at 'offset' with 'delay' > > + in us afterwards. > > If we wanted this type of thing in DT, we'd have a generic binding (or > forth). Right now, this is a qualcomm usb phy specific bindings - first used in qcom,usb-hs-phy.txt and I extended it a bit for my phy. As this is not a so good hardware description, I'm a little hesitated to make it generic for other platforms to use in general. What about we put off it a little bit until we see more platforms need the same thing? Shawn > This should probably be split between SoC specific settings in > the driver and board properties in DT.
