On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:40:37PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:18:14AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > Looking at patch 4, if matching the name is what you want to do, then > > use the DT name matching functions. They were added in 4.19. > > That is something that the of_fwnode_get_named_child_node() needs > to use (would have needed). > > Regardless of what we do with that callback, fwnode_name() needs to > return the name in from that for example of_node_name_eq() takes as > the second parameter. So "node-name@unit-address" is not OK. Sorry for > not realizeing that before. > > So I guess we need to either get the "node-name" from that full_name > member in of_fwnode_name() (Andy, are you OK with that?), or is there > already a helper that does it for us? Looking into existing API I think we need something like of_node_name_extract() of_node_name_eq() { name = of_node_name_extract(); return strlen()...strncmp()...; } The question is who is going to allocate and free memory for the name out of it. OTOH, of_fwnode_get_named_child_node() might need to copy that code which brings the consistency issue (several places to maintain the same set of rules, i.e. how we extract name out of full_name). So, removal of name field shouldn't be done until we resolve the issue with of_fwnode_get_named_child_node(). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko