On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:50:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:17 AM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +static const char *of_fwnode_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +{
> > + return to_of_node(fwnode)->name;
>
> I'm trying to get rid of the DT name ptr, so please don't add one. You
> can use of_node_full_name() here instead if "<name>@<unit-address>"
> instead of <name> is fine. Otherwise, you've got to allocate your own
> storage and use "%pOFn" printf specifier.
If we do this here, we will change a behaviour of the entire set of
of_fwnode_get_named_child_node() users.
I think this is out of scope of the series.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
