Hi Ian,
On 02/11/2018 15:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] devicetree,xen: add xen,shared-memory binding"):
On 11/1/18 8:40 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From the DT binding point of view, it would be fine. Conceptually it
would also be fine. However, I doubt that the current libxl
implementation would work with multiple mappings.
I can't see why it would not work. I think we designed the refcount for
this purpose.
libxl doesn't see the actual mappings, does it ? It just puts things
into the p2m.
Yes. That's why I think multiple mappings is actually possible.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
