Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] devicetree,xen: add xen,shared-memory binding"):
> On 11/1/18 8:40 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > From the DT binding point of view, it would be fine. Conceptually it
> > would also be fine. However, I doubt that the current libxl
> > implementation would work with multiple mappings.
>
> I can't see why it would not work. I think we designed the refcount for
> this purpose.
libxl doesn't see the actual mappings, does it ? It just puts things
into the p2m.
Ian.
