On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:11:06 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:04:51 +0200
> Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Boris
> >
> > Maybe we want to leave the pdata example.
> >
> > /**
> > * The platform resource layout expected looks something like:
> > * struct mtd_partition partitions[] = { ... };
> > * struct physmap_flash_data flash_data =
> > .....
>
> Sure, I'll add it back.
Actually I changed my mind on that one. The physmap driver did not
document that in the first place, so, if we want to add this example,
we should do it in a separate patch, and maybe place it next to the
physmap_flash_data struct definition. This being said, I don't see a
lot of drivers documenting this sort of things and I doubt new
platforms will use pdata to describe their device anyway.
