On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > Optional properties: > > > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control > > > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control > > Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards > > conforming property or would best practice be to call it enable-gpios or > > something? > Oh I didn't think of that really. The gpio-regulator indeed uses > enable-gpio for the same thing. But it complicates things codewise, > as the GPIO line is also optional. I'm a bit uncertain, I tend > to think just "gpios" is fine when the usage is unambigous. but > I don't know what the DT maintainers think. Right, well from my point of view -gpio is perfectly fine also so... :) Rob?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
