Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: Use more standard GPIO binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > >  Optional properties:
> > > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> > > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control

> > Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards
> > conforming property or would best practice be to call it enable-gpios or
> > something?

> Oh I didn't think of that really. The gpio-regulator indeed uses
> enable-gpio for the same thing. But it complicates things codewise,
> as the GPIO line is also optional. I'm a bit uncertain, I tend
> to think just "gpios" is fine when the usage is unambigous. but
> I don't know what the DT maintainers think.

Right, well from my point of view -gpio is perfectly fine also so... :)
Rob?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux