On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > Optional properties: > > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control > > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control > > Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards > conforming property or would best practice be to call it enable-gpios or > something? Oh I didn't think of that really. The gpio-regulator indeed uses enable-gpio for the same thing. But it complicates things codewise, as the GPIO line is also optional. I'm a bit uncertain, I tend to think just "gpios" is fine when the usage is unambigous. but I don't know what the DT maintainers think. Yours, Linus Walleij
