On 28-09-18, 08:53, Andrea Merello wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:25 PM Vinod <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > @@ -964,7 +968,7 @@ static int xilinx_dma_calc_copysize(struct xilinx_dma_chan *chan,
> > > int size, int done)
> > > {
> > > size_t copy = min_t(size_t, size - done,
> > > - XILINX_DMA_MAX_TRANS_LEN);
> > > + chan->xdev->max_buffer_len);
> >
> > hmm why not add max_buffer_len in patch 1 again, and then use default
> > len as XILINX_DMA_MAX_TRANS_LEN and add multiple lengths here :)
>
> Sorry, I'm not getting your point. Could you please elaborate the "add
> multiple lengths here" thing ?
IIRC (sorry been travelling and vacation), add
chan->xdev->max_buffer_len in patch 1 and initialize it to
XILINX_DMA_MAX_TRANS_LEN. Then in subsequent patches update the length.
--
~Vinod
