From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:00:23 -0700 > The current cpsw usage for cpsw-phy-sel is undocumented but is used for > all the boards using cpsw. And cpsw-phy-sel is not really a child of > the cpsw device, it lives in the system control module instead. > > Let's document the existing usage, and improve it a bit where we prefer > to use a phandle instead of a child device for it. That way we can > properly describe the hardware in dts files for things like genpd. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> Applied.
