> > > +Specifying phy control of devices > > > +================================= > > > + > > > +Device nodes should specify the configuration required in their "phys" > > > +property, containing a phandle to the miphy device node, a port number > > > +and a device type. > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.h> > > > + > > > + sata0: sata@fe380000 { > > > + ... > > > + phys = <&miphy365x_phy MIPHY_PORT_0 MIPHY_TYPE_SATA>; > > > + ... > > > + }; > > > > Is there not a generic phy binding we can point to? It seems a bit > > redundant to do this in each phy binding. > > Sure, but that wouldn't make much of an example. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-bindings.txt Ah sorry, I see what you mean now. No, not yet. That's the next thing to go up into Mainline. I will replace this second example with a link when the other documentation document has been accepted. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html