Hi Kedar, On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 06:50PM +0530, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote: > This patch adds xilinx CAN controller support. > This driver supports both ZYNQ CANPS and Soft IP > AXI CAN controller. > [...] > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/xilinx_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/xilinx_can.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..0e57103 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/xilinx_can.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ > +Xilinx Axi CAN/Zynq CANPS controller Device Tree Bindings > +--------------------------------------------------------- > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : Should be "xlnx,zynq-can-1.00.a" for Zynq CAN > + controllers and "xlnx,axi-can-1.00.a" for Axi CAN > + controllers. > +- reg : Physical base address and size of the Axi CAN/Zynq > + CANPS registers map. > +- interrupts : Property with a value describing the interrupt > + number. > +- interrupt-parent : Must be core interrupt controller > +- clock-names : List of input clock names - "ref_clk", "aper_clk" Let's reconsider these names. These are rather Zynq specific names. Does the IP documentation use these as well? The names should match the naming used for the IP, rather than the SOC. Is this the correct data sheet: http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/axi_can/v1_03_a/ds791_axi_can.pdf ? According to that the names should rather be 's_axi_aclk' and 'can_clk', IMHO. Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
