On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 11:54 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:35:28PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > On 8 August 2018 at 17:50, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Right, I don't think we added this yet (if we did I can't see
> > > it). I'd
> > > add a new field to spi_transfer for this, then other controllers
> > > with
> > > the same support can implement it as well and drivers can start
> > > using
> > > it too.
> > OK. So I will name the new filed as 'word_delay', is it OK for you?
>
> Sounds good, yes.
Should it be in µs like the existing iter-transfer delay? I think
perhaps units of cycles of the SPI clock make more sense?��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
