On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +0000, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote: > > On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports > > > this mode of operation when I reviewed an earlier version, I didn't > > > notice a reply on that? > > > Sorry, I got confused about what needs to be done. Should I add a new field > > to the regmap_config struct which will be checked during the function call? > > Something like can_multi_write? How do you suggest it should be called? Is > > readable_noinc_reg ok? > > Like I said last time I'd suggest making it more like the readable and > volatile checks - I'm fairly sure I've seen devices that don't > autoincrement only for some registers. I can confirm I have seen hardware that autoincrements for some registers and not for others. Thanks, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html