On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
>
> >
> > + if (!regmap_volatile(map, reg) || !regmap_readable(map, reg))
> > {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> this mode of operation when I reviewed an earlier version, I didn't
> notice a reply on that?
Hi Mark,
Sorry, I got confused about what needs to be done. Should I add a new field
to the regmap_config struct which will be checked during the function call?
Something like can_multi_write? How do you suggest it should be called? Is
readable_noinc_reg ok?
Thank you!
Stefan��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
