On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 12:26:31PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Not really my problem that they didn't follow the process and upstream > their binding first. But this alone is just a string identifier, so I > don't really care that much. If things are really a mess, then the > next implementations will have to have better compatible strings. More > likely, I'll just see folks trying to add various properties to deal > with all the differences. > > You could always define a better compatible and leave 'riscv,plic0' as > a fallback to avoid breaking things. Is there any better way to define a compatible other than having duplicate IRQCHIP_DECLARE() statements? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
