On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 16:52 +0800, Mars Cheng wrote:
> From: Owen Chen <owen.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> MT6765 add "set/clr" register for each clkmux setting, and
> one update register to trigger value change. It is designed
> to prevent read-modify-write racing issue. The sw design
> need to add a new API to handle this hw change with a new
> mtk_clk_mux/mtk_clk_upd struct in new file "clk-mux"and
> clk-upd".
>
I don't see any word mtk_clk_upd or clk-upd in the patch
and the patch needs to be split into more patches
> Signed-off-by: Owen Chen <owen.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c | 41 +++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h | 85 ++++++++++++---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h | 38 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 388 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
> index 844b55d..b97980d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MEDIATEK) += clk-mtk.o clk-pll.o clk-gate.o clk-apmixed.o clk-cpumux.o reset.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MEDIATEK) += clk-mtk.o clk-pll.o clk-gate.o clk-apmixed.o clk-cpumux.o reset.o clk-mux.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6797) += clk-mt6797.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6797_IMGSYS) += clk-mt6797-img.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6797_MMSYS) += clk-mt6797-mm.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
> index 9c0ae42..50becd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>
> #include "clk-mtk.h"
> +#include "clk-mux.h"
> #include "clk-gate.h"
>
> struct clk_onecell_data *mtk_alloc_clk_data(unsigned int clk_num)
> @@ -144,6 +145,46 @@ int mtk_clk_register_gates(struct device_node *node,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int mtk_clk_register_muxes(const struct mtk_mux *muxes,
> + int num, struct device_node *node,
> + spinlock_t *lock,
> + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data)
> +{
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!clk_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
general register function is able to handle that there is no clk_data.
It looks like a optional, not a mandatory
> + regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> + pr_err("Cannot find regmap for %pOF: %ld\n", node,
> + PTR_ERR(regmap));
> + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + const struct mtk_mux *mux = &muxes[i];
> +
> + if (clk_data && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->clks[mux->id]))
> + continue;
> +
it seems not necessary to check clk data every time
and always use positive check is good to read
> + clk = mtk_clk_register_mux(mux, regmap, lock);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + pr_err("Failed to register clk %s: %ld\n",
> + mux->name, PTR_ERR(clk));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (clk_data)
> + clk_data->clks[mux->id] = clk;
don't alter any data from input, that is a surprise for users
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> struct clk *mtk_clk_register_composite(const struct mtk_composite *mc,
> void __iomem *base, spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h
> index 1882221..61693f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,9 @@
>
> #define MAX_MUX_GATE_BIT 31
> #define INVALID_MUX_GATE_BIT (MAX_MUX_GATE_BIT + 1)
> -
> +#define INVALID_OFS -1
> +#define INVALID_SHFT -1
> +#define INVALID_WIDTH -1
> #define MHZ (1000 * 1000)
>
> struct mtk_fixed_clk {
> @@ -84,10 +86,72 @@ struct mtk_composite {
> signed char num_parents;
> };
>
> +struct mtk_mux {
> + int id;
> + const char *name;
> + const char * const *parent_names;
> + unsigned int flags;
> +
> + u32 mux_ofs;
> + u32 set_ofs;
> + u32 clr_ofs;
> + u32 upd_ofs;
> +
> + signed char mux_shift;
> + signed char mux_width;
> + signed char gate_shift;
> + signed char upd_shift;
> +
> + const struct clk_ops *ops;
> +
> + signed char num_parents;
> +};
> +
you have created a mtk-mux.h, why is you don't move the newly create
struct in?
> /*
> * In case the rate change propagation to parent clocks is undesirable,
> * this macro allows to specify the clock flags manually.
> */
> +#define CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs,\
> + _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, _gate, \
> + _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, _ops) { \
> + .id = _id, \
> + .name = _name, \
> + .mux_ofs = _mux_ofs, \
> + .set_ofs = _mux_set_ofs, \
> + .clr_ofs = _mux_clr_ofs, \
> + .upd_ofs = _upd_ofs, \
> + .mux_shift = _shift, \
> + .mux_width = _width, \
> + .gate_shift = _gate, \
> + .upd_shift = _upd, \
> + .parent_names = _parents, \
> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(_parents), \
> + .flags = _flags, \
> + .ops = &_ops, \
> + }
> +
> +#define MUX_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs,\
> + _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, _gate, \
> + _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags) \
> + CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, \
> + mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops)
> +
> +#define MUX_CLR_SET_UPD(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, \
> + _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, _gate, \
> + _upd_ofs, _upd) \
> + MUX_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
> +
> +#define MUX_UPD(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, _shift, _width, _gate, \
> + _upd_ofs, _upd) \
> + CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> + INVALID_OFS, INVALID_OFS, _shift, _width, \
> + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, \
> + mtk_mux_upd_ops)
> +
> #define MUX_GATE_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width, \
> _gate, _flags) { \
> .id = _id, \
> @@ -111,18 +175,8 @@ struct mtk_composite {
> MUX_GATE_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width, \
> _gate, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
>
> -#define MUX(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width) { \
> - .id = _id, \
> - .name = _name, \
> - .mux_reg = _reg, \
> - .mux_shift = _shift, \
> - .mux_width = _width, \
> - .gate_shift = -1, \
> - .divider_shift = -1, \
> - .parent_names = _parents, \
> - .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(_parents), \
> - .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, \
> - }
As Matthias always said that, you alter the common thing that is already
used by a lot of SoC.
You should have a dedicate patch to state why you need it, provide the
way you propose. and use another patches for migrating old SoC, finally
then add the patch for your own SoC.
Don't mix everything in a single patch. The patch can't become reusable
hard to read it, even hard to backport to the other SoC picking up
patches they are really wanting.
> +#define MUX(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width) \
> + MUX_GATE(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width, INVALID_SHFT)
>
> #define DIV_GATE(_id, _name, _parent, _gate_reg, _gate_shift, _div_reg, \
> _div_width, _div_shift) { \
> @@ -138,6 +192,11 @@ struct mtk_composite {
> .flags = 0, \
> }
>
> +int mtk_clk_register_muxes(const struct mtk_mux *muxes,
> + int num, struct device_node *node,
> + spinlock_t *lock,
> + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data);
> +
move to mtk-mux.h
> struct clk *mtk_clk_register_composite(const struct mtk_composite *mc,
> void __iomem *base, spinlock_t *lock);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..219181b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc.
> + * Author: Owen Chen <owen.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "clk-mtk.h"
> +#include "clk-mux.h"
> +
> +static inline struct mtk_clk_mux
> + *to_mtk_clk_mux(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + return container_of(hw, struct mtk_clk_mux, hw);
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_mux_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 mask = BIT(mux->gate_shift);
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
> +
we can see many functions in kernel, similar to your need, they always
be defined as two versions. for example.
mtk_mux_enable refer to lock version
mtk_mux_enable_nolock for lock-free version
that makes less condition, more readable, and users don't care much
about what stuff is put inside
> + regmap_update_bits(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, mask, 0);
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_mux_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 mask = BIT(mux->gate_shift);
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
> +
ditto
> + regmap_update_bits(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, mask, mask);
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_mux_enable_setclr(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 val;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
> +
ditto
> + val = BIT(mux->gate_shift);
> + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_clr_ofs, val);
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_mux_disable_setclr(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 val;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
> +
ditto
> + val = BIT(mux->gate_shift);
> + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_set_ofs, val);
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_mux_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 val = 0;
> +
> + if (mux->gate_shift < 0)
> + return true;
> +
return value should be bool
> + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val);
> +
> + return (val & BIT(mux->gate_shift)) == 0;
> +}
> +
> +static u8 mtk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
return value should be int
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
> + u32 mask = GENMASK(mux->mux_width - 1, 0);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val);
> + val = (val >> mux->mux_shift) & mask;
> +
> + if (val >= num_parents)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 mask = GENMASK(mux->mux_width - 1, 0);
> + u32 val, orig;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
> +
use lock-free-or-not funciton
> + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val);
> + orig = val;
> + val &= ~(mask << mux->mux_shift);
> + val |= index << mux->mux_shift;
> +
> + if (val != orig) {
> + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, val);
> +
> + if (mux->upd_shift >= 0)
> + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->upd_ofs,
> + BIT(mux->upd_shift));
why not use regmap_update_bits like function ?
> + }
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_mux_set_parent_setclr(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 mask = GENMASK(mux->mux_width - 1, 0);
> + u32 val, orig;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
> +
use lock-free-or-not funciton
> + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val);
> + orig = val;
> + val &= ~(mask << mux->mux_shift);
> + val |= index << mux->mux_shift;
> +
> + if (val != orig) {
> + val = (mask << mux->mux_shift);
> + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_clr_ofs, val);
> + val = (index << mux->mux_shift);
> + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_set_ofs, val);
> +
why not use regmap_update_bits like function ?
> + if (mux->upd_shift >= 0)
> + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->upd_ofs,
> + BIT(mux->upd_shift));
> + }
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_upd_ops = {
> + .enable = mtk_mux_enable,
> + .disable = mtk_mux_disable,
> + .is_enabled = mtk_mux_is_enabled,
> + .get_parent = mtk_mux_get_parent,
> + .set_parent = mtk_mux_set_parent,
> + .determine_rate = NULL,
explicitly set as NULL can be removed
> +};
> +
> +const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops = {
> + .enable = mtk_mux_enable_setclr,
> + .disable = mtk_mux_disable_setclr,
> + .is_enabled = mtk_mux_is_enabled,
> + .get_parent = mtk_mux_get_parent,
> + .set_parent = mtk_mux_set_parent_setclr,
> + .determine_rate = NULL,
explicitly set as NULL can be removed
> +};
> +
> +struct clk *mtk_clk_register_mux(const struct mtk_mux *mux,
> + struct regmap *regmap,
> + spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + struct clk *clk;
> + struct clk_init_data init;
> + struct mtk_clk_mux *mtk_mux = NULL;
> + int ret;
> +
make declaration as reverse xmas tree
> + mtk_mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mtk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!mtk_mux)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + init.name = mux->name;
> + init.flags = (mux->flags) | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> + init.parent_names = mux->parent_names;
> + init.num_parents = mux->num_parents;
> + init.ops = mux->ops;
> +
> + mtk_mux->regmap = regmap;
> + mtk_mux->name = mux->name;
> + mtk_mux->mux_ofs = mux->mux_ofs;
> + mtk_mux->mux_set_ofs = mux->set_ofs;
> + mtk_mux->mux_clr_ofs = mux->clr_ofs;
> + mtk_mux->upd_ofs = mux->upd_ofs;
> + mtk_mux->mux_shift = mux->mux_shift;
> + mtk_mux->mux_width = mux->mux_width;
> + mtk_mux->gate_shift = mux->gate_shift;
> + mtk_mux->upd_shift = mux->upd_shift;
> +
> + mtk_mux->lock = lock;
> + mtk_mux->hw.init = &init;
> +
> + clk = clk_register(NULL, &mtk_mux->hw);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(clk);
ret is superfluous
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> +
> + return clk;
> +err_out:
> + kfree(mtk_mux);
> +
I felt err path can be optimized
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..64f8e7c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc.
> + * Author: Owen Chen <owen.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __DRV_CLK_MUX_H
> +#define __DRV_CLK_MUX_H
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +
> +struct mtk_clk_mux {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> +
> + const char *name;
> +
> + int mux_set_ofs;
> + int mux_clr_ofs;
> + int mux_ofs;
> + int upd_ofs;
> +
> + s8 mux_shift;
> + s8 mux_width;
> + s8 gate_shift;
> + s8 upd_shift;
> +
> + spinlock_t *lock;
> +};
> +
> +extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_upd_ops;
> +extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops;
> +
extern is superfluous
> +struct clk *mtk_clk_register_mux(const struct mtk_mux *mux,
> + struct regmap *regmap,
> + spinlock_t *lock);
> +
> +#endif /* __DRV_CLK_MUX_H */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
