On 18 July 2018 at 22:37, Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 21:48 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Fix incorrect format used for OR clause in SPDX license identifier. > > Can you please elaborate how you got to that conclusion as there are > various other device trees having it specified the exact same way. Plus > I was actually even in discussion with Philippe on that patch set back > when I introduced those. Hi, I thought these were pointed by checkpatch but it was my mistake - checkpatch complained about missing SPDX in tegra124-apalis.dtsi, not about these files. Maybe I was mislead by the in-kernel example [1]... although SPDX specification uses them so I think this patch can be abandoned. [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18-rc5/source/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst#L130 Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
