On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 1:47:01 AM CEST Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > cpufreq stubs out some functions when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n , but > cpufreq_update_policy() is not among them. The throttler driver > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10453351/) uses cpufreq as one > possible throttling mechanism, but it can still be useful without > cpufreq. Stubbing out cpufreq_update_policy() allows the throttler > driver to be built without ugly #ifdef'ery when cpufreq is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v5: > - none > > Changes in v4: > - added 'Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>' tag > > Changes in v3: > - patch added to series > --- > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > index 882a9b9e34bc..dba8c4951e2e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static inline unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_max(unsigned int cpu) > return 0; > } > static inline void disable_cpufreq(void) { } > +static inline void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) { } > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT > I can take this patch if you want me to. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
