* Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180703 07:31]: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 03 July 2018 12:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [180611 07:06]: > >> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180611 06:48]: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Monday 11 June 2018 11:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>>> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180611 06:28]: > >>>>> Great. I thought I completely misunderstood you. But I don't see what > >>>>> adding another function will accomplish. A QUIRK flag used in the same > >>>>> function would work well enough> > >>>> Fine with me as long as the function stays simple for both > >>>> syss and sysc reset. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> In general a reset status bit being in sysstatus is the norm and it > >>> being in sysconfig should be the "quirk" for which a flag needs to be > >>> added. What do you think? > >> > >> Sure makes sense to me. > >> > >>> As an aside, naming bitshifts by the name of the platform they were > >>> originally added in seems weird. There should be some generic mask > >>> saying "soft reset is the 0th bit". Currently I am using > >>> SYSC_OMAP4_SOFTRESET for a dra76x module. I guess it depends on how many > >>> different sysconfig types we have. > >> > >> Sure we could have a macro for that. > > > > So what's the conclusion on this one? Are you going to do one > > more version of the ti-sysc driver patch? > > > > Yes. I have just now been able to get back to this. Will post a v4 by > tomorrow. OK thanks! Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
